Philip Esdaile has been very kind to help expand the PAC 750XL section of DiverDriver.com. He is the president of Utility Aircraft Corporation. Thank you so much Philip and I hope all can find great use out of it. Spread the word and raise awareness!
ATTENTION! ATTENTION! YOU NEED TO READ THIS NOW IF YOU’RE FLYING SKYDIVERS. YOUR CERTIFICATE CAN BE AT RISK.
A recent tandem fatality in California, USA has lead to great concern that scores of skydivers who present themselves as Tandem Instructors may not actually be certified at all.
I want to welcome over 100 new members! Thank you for taking an interest in the Facebook Group for my website www.DiverDriver.com. It has been a resource for jump pilots, DZOs and skydivers since December of 2000.
I think there is a growing problem. Since 2008 I have been monitoring several single engine turbine accidents and incidents. Most have been Caravans, but there are a few reports of PAC-750s. The problems seem to stem from the concept that a single engine turbine is just a step up in power over a single engine piston aircraft. However, the types of accidents I am seeing leads me to believe that not enough information is being shared and training has been inadequate for the growing number of single engine turbine aircraft in the skydiving fleet.
What do you feel should be the standard ground instruction time and flight time
This is a document that just came out from the FAA January 2016. It’s only two pages long in pdf. It’s a good quick read and should be part of any initial jump pilot training to reinforce what should already be known but sadly we’ve seen the results from inaction or incorrect action. YOU WILL BE STARTLED
Who shoved a bottle into the side wall of a Twin Otter will never be known. However, where it ended up was found during an inspection. How long it had been there is only limited by the last time this inspection was required.
This NTSB final report has come out on a 182 crash at Geneseo, IL. The FAA does not understand the fuel system of the early 182 models. The old Cessna 182 (1956) A through (1960) D has an unusable fuel of 5 GALLONS PER TANK. In the report they say that 9 gallons were left which 6.5 were usable. This is not true. It would be 4 gallons and I question even that. Pitching “up and down” is maneuvering flight. Second, the right tank was dry. There may be a venting problem which caused the system to syphon the right tank dry and then a vacuum prevented fuel from flowing from the left tank. If you have to pitch up and down to get fuel that tells me you know you have wrinkled fuel tank bladders. That plane is unairworthy to begin with and unusable fuel goes up above the 5 per tank normal! While the NTSB correctly states the cause of the accident as fuel exhaustion the body of the report leaves you scratching your head as to how that can be. Fuel exhaustion is no more usable fuel. Fuel starvation is fuel is on board but for some reason is not making it to the engine to be combusted. Please Please Please stop thinking you have more usable fuel in these old models. The POH is very misleading in how it states the unusable fuel. You are ALWAYS maneuvering in the traffic pattern to land. Unusable fuel is TEN gallons total, five gallons per tank. You can reference Cessna 182 Type Data Sheet here. Join our Facebook group for easy...
If you are looking for work as a jump pilot
After an incredibly quiet first half of the year 2015 we have had a spate of jump plane accidents in the USA and elsewhere. This is not uncommon as this is the height of the skydiving season in many parts of the world.
Twenty years ago a friend suggested that I needed to build my total time faster because my corporate job really wasn’t going to advance my career.
Reports are coming in a Cessna 182 accident. A tandem pair got hung up on the step attempting to exit.
I have had a lot of requests for information on best ways to operate turbocharged engines in skydiving operations.
The summary below is taken from page IX of…
Don’t forget to join our Facebook page to stay up to date with our website updates and other goings on.
The United States Parachute Association once again hosted the Dropzone Operators Conference in conjunction with the Board of Directors meeting
I am very honored to have the guidance I have written on jump plane formation flying accepted and reproduced on
About a year ago I made a blog post here about whether the “money shot” (rolling hard after last jumper was out so that you could dive past the freefalling jumper) was worth it. I added video and a graphic photo of what the collision with a freefall photographer’s face looks like. However, a Porter pilot at Thai Sky Adventures decided his metal was better.
The question about whether single-engine planes versus multi-engine planes are safer has been asked recently. Until now I had not grouped the jump plane accidents here in those types of categories. You can click here to see the results that will update as accidents are added to the database.